About The Author
-

20 Comments

Leave a Reply to Edwin solis torres Cancel reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • Mississippi Mike
    Reply

    I thank you kindly, ma'am. Certainly, if I ever go down y'all's way, I'll take you up on that drink invitation! I'm sure we would have a lovely time talking. And thanks for subscribing, very nice of you. Have a wonderful day.

  • Mike Morrison
    Reply

    Posting a well-established argument on youtube is both difficult, and extrmeely unwieldy. In short:

    The entire conflict between North and South ultimately was about "slavery." The "States Rights" thing was because Southerners thought the Northerners were tyrants, attempting to deny the right to own property. When in fact, it was the Southern slave owners who were the tyrants for wanting to propagate a disgusting, immoral, and degenerate system that was rooted in pure racism.

  • Lizzirawrsyou
    Reply

    Hah I was born and raised in Colombus Mississippi REALLY Small town I'm only 13 now and i moved here when I was 9 and I miss it there so much! And BTW IF YOU FUCK WITH ANYONE FROM MISSISSIPPI 1ST OF ALL THEY'LL FUCK YOU UP THEN 2ND ILL FUCK YOU UP THEN 3RD WE'LL RUIN YOUR LIFE 4TH WE CAN GET AWAY WITH ANYTHING 5TH have a nice day(:

  • Mike Morrison
    Reply

    Because population of a state matters when determining the number of Representatives in the House, that was one issue where the Southerns thought of the North as "tyrants," and so they screamed bloody murder, and yelled out "STATES RIGHTS!!!!"

  • Mike Morrison
    Reply

    …..right up to the so-called "states rights" issue, it was always about slavery. It was about whether or not slave owners had the right to take their slaves into Northern states where it was banned** (more on this in a minute). It was about whether slavery should be allowed in the territories, and whether new states should allow slavery. "Slavery" has ALWAYS been the hallmark of the conflict between the two regions.

  • Mike Morrison
    Reply

    ..Because all those nations (and many, many more. Even Haiti!) have, first, banned the slave trade. Many of those nations then turned around and banned slavery altogether:

    (See: Abolition of slavery on wikiedia)

    In short: Slavery was seen as a disgusting form of human failure throughout most the entire world. The Northern were (rightly) disgusted with the idea of slavery in a nation that proclaims "FREEDOM!" Especially in light of the fact that dozens of foreign nations have banned it.

  • Rikki0
    Reply

    Well, Steadno. I'm sure that with those kinds of thoughts and that kind of language, YOUR place in heaven is secured. LMAO!

  • mississippiboy25
    Reply

    I think people really need to do their own research. The Southern States suceeded from the Union not because of slavery but because of their 5th Amendment Rights the government was trying to take away. At that time, 6% of the Southern population owned slaves. Why on earth would all those people fight and die so that few people could keep their slaves? Do your OWN research before jumping to conclusions!!