Why is this guy always reviewing gamepsot big games? He always seem to hate on everything that he doesn't like even the small pieces of the game. Example "This rock is to bug I don't like it." Pathetic.
If there's 1 thing I've learned from mainstream reviews… it's DON'T LISTEN TO ANY MAINSTREAM REVIEWS. I don't think 1 reviewer in the past 5-6 years has given a review I can agree with on anything.
Call of Duty for example. Mainstream reviewers hype the shit out of them every damn year saying how good they are, then when you get them you realize it's a Michael Bay style game with a cliche/boring story and lots of explosions.
Not saying CoD is bad, just that it's a 6/10… not an 8/10 or above. It's a cheesy action game with cliche written all over it. It's fun, but nothing special.
Arkham Knight is SPECIAL. At least in my opinion. It didn't have a prequel last year, or a prequel the year before the prequel, it's been 4 years since Arkham City, and I don't know about anyone else but I'm aching to unmask the Knight.
I guess Rocksteady does not line reviewers pockets like Rockstar do to get 10/10s across the board for boring games with broken online. Have not played this so dont know if it warrants a 7 one way or another
Grand Theft Auto 5 while fun overall had mandatory, lackluster missions as well, and yet it gets a 9.0 while this gets a 7.0 for the same problem? Am I saying that GTA V should get a lower score? No, it shouldn't. In fact, I'm not even here to say Batman AK should have a higher score. I'm just here to say that Gamespot's scoring system is trash and should be ignored.
Gamespot, your review are so stupid, you gave Call of Duty ghosts an 8/10 even though that is a piece of SHIT yet you give this game that got multiple 10/10s a fucking 7/10 what is wrong with you?
Just a reminder, these are the same people who gave Far Cry 4 a 7/10, Alien Isolation a 6/10, THE LAST OF US a 8/10 and they gave Call of Duty advanced Warfare a 9/10. It's obvious they get paid for giving a game a good review
you give Batman Arkham Knight a 7, Far Cry 4 a 7, Alien Isolation a 6, Wolfenstein the New Order a 7, The Last of Us an 8 but give Call of Duty AW a 9?
GameSpot fails in their attempts to be critical. High polished well designed game gets a low score for subjective reasons, It's alien isolation all over again.
While the points In this review were valid, docking it so many points for too much batmobile, and predictable storyline (which varies from person to person) is a bit extreme. Ign gave it a 9 and polygon gave it a 10. These problems are clearly not big enough to detract from the overall experience.
Why is this guy always reviewing gamepsot big games? He always seem to hate on everything that he doesn't like even the small pieces of the game. Example "This rock is to bug I don't like it." Pathetic.
If there's 1 thing I've learned from mainstream reviews… it's DON'T LISTEN TO ANY MAINSTREAM REVIEWS. I don't think 1 reviewer in the past 5-6 years has given a review I can agree with on anything.
Call of Duty for example. Mainstream reviewers hype the shit out of them every damn year saying how good they are, then when you get them you realize it's a Michael Bay style game with a cliche/boring story and lots of explosions.
Not saying CoD is bad, just that it's a 6/10… not an 8/10 or above. It's a cheesy action game with cliche written all over it. It's fun, but nothing special.
Arkham Knight is SPECIAL. At least in my opinion. It didn't have a prequel last year, or a prequel the year before the prequel, it's been 4 years since Arkham City, and I don't know about anyone else but I'm aching to unmask the Knight.
Why so many down votes.. none of you have even played the game yet.. I can't believe people actually get offended over review scores..
I guess Rocksteady does not line reviewers pockets like Rockstar do to get 10/10s across the board for boring games with broken online. Have not played this so dont know if it warrants a 7 one way or another
I don't care what +GameSpot review score was.. I'm still buying
Grand Theft Auto 5 while fun overall had mandatory, lackluster missions as well, and yet it gets a 9.0 while this gets a 7.0 for the same problem? Am I saying that GTA V should get a lower score? No, it shouldn't. In fact, I'm not even here to say Batman AK should have a higher score. I'm just here to say that Gamespot's scoring system is trash and should be ignored.
Reminds me of their skyward sword review. Fans flipped the fuck out, but their arguments were sound
A 7/10 is a decent score, what the fuck is wrong with you, sociopaths?
Gamespot, your review are so stupid, you gave Call of Duty ghosts an 8/10 even though that is a piece of SHIT yet you give this game that got multiple 10/10s a fucking 7/10 what is wrong with you?
"Too much Batmobile. 7.0/10" – GameSpot
This is game spot they don't like batman
Just a reminder, these are the same people who gave Far Cry 4 a 7/10, Alien Isolation a 6/10, THE LAST OF US a 8/10 and they gave Call of Duty advanced Warfare a 9/10. It's obvious they get paid for giving a game a good review
Good job, everyone. Way to perpetuate all those negative stereotypes about gamers' maturity and civility.
Too much rain -7/10.
you give Batman Arkham Knight a 7, Far Cry 4 a 7, Alien Isolation a 6, Wolfenstein the New Order a 7, The Last of Us an 8 but give Call of Duty AW a 9?
Too much batmobile justifies a 7? If they didnt put the batmobile in the game you bitchy reviewers would complain about no new innovations.
GameSpot fails in their attempts to be critical. High polished well designed game gets a low score for subjective reasons, It's alien isolation all over again.
While the points In this review were valid, docking it so many points for too much batmobile, and predictable storyline (which varies from person to person) is a bit extreme. Ign gave it a 9 and polygon gave it a 10. These problems are clearly not big enough to detract from the overall experience.
Good! that means TW3 is the GOTY!
are you downvoting because this guy is honest about what he thinks? i don't get the downvotes.