About The Author
-

20 Comments

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • Mary Kate Daniiher
    Reply

    @starquant He's nothing but an old lecher trying to grease as many young women as he can before he dies. Why doesn't he pick a woman closer to his age?. He's supposed to be an intellectual who has nothing is common with young women other than their bodies. He objectifies them which is the ultimate insult.

  • ToeIn2194
    Reply

    This has nothing to do with bitterness. The guy is a glorified pornographer who opened a Pandoras Box and it has led us into a society saturated,finally,with pornography and the tragic escalation of "the nex't" big "thrill',people so bored with "standard' porn that CHILDREN are being sexploited to the jaded masses.He is the dirt of this earth living like royalty while pimping out his screwed up ,pathetic existence. Go hang out i the grotto,loser.

  • ToeIn2194
    Reply

    @sohooded Exactly. To the point. Unfortunately the damage has been done. The pandoras box of toxic bs is saturated in our culture. Men don't even know what is pretty and decent and feminine anymore,and todays women just walk around like a parody of these types. What is lost is unimaginable to the dignity of real femininity.This is a glorified pornographer who likens himself to be a gentlemens gentleman. Nothing could be further fom the truth.

  • tiemedown
    Reply

    I'm sure that in your world capitilization denotes brilliance but that is not the case. He was certainly not the first person to export sex and he is not the catalyst for society's obsession with taboos. He owns a franchise, he employs writers and takes pictorials. He is not in the market of child trafficking or pornography. You dont have to like his market but illogical slander is not the way to go. And connecting general sexuality to the horror of child porn is frankly offensive and untrue.

  • tiemedown
    Reply

    someones bitter. I dont see anything wrong with the beauty of Jennifer Jackson. In fact a good portion of the girls he started his company with were baby faced girls with small breasts. You clearly have more problems with cruel cultural standards and the people who buy the magizine. And I would be careful using the word rape, you clearly have no respect for the term to use it for something so provincial. Believe youre beautiful or dont, he wont know if you have a happy life but you will.

  • Mary Kate Daniiher
    Reply

    @shelleyjudd Yeah he's an amazing lecher who could never relate to a "real" woman his own age. Can you imagine him in the nude???? LOL LOL

  • ToeIn2194
    Reply

    @sohooded You are correct in all of this. Hugh Hefner kidnapped the very intrinsic mystery that makes life in and of itself natural . Have you ever seen the way he tries to come off very intellectual and "with it?" After all he gave black women the equal right to degrade themselves. Btw,he tried and maybe,[???private stock,perhaps?], succeeded in making a private film about a young woman being "deflowered."

  • tiemedown
    Reply

    Lot of judgement here. This was a break up. A guy couldnt commit to a girl and went for the player option. Its all of you that give it this apparent social gravity. Hugh Hefner's a business man, for all that he deals in put upon sexuality he was one of the first to give african american girls a platform and has been a gay rights activist before it was safe to do so. He is no saint but a painted woman in my opinion is better than the violence of modern porn. There are more important battles.