It was unmanned, and astronauts aboard the International Space Station still have 4 months of supplies. But it’s the third failed cargo mission to ISS in 8 months.
well… okay then. sh*t happens, right? build another one. yes, it's expensive, but if you're not down to lose a few rockets, you should probably get out of rocketry. like cdr. kelly (who is on the space station right now) said when he watched this, "space is hard."
With all the advances made in technology we still launch rockets that fail – NASA should probably update their methods or at least use the alien technology their hiding
In fifty years many things could have been achieved at least; self contained clusters of space stations on the moon and its vicinity, growing food in green houses, launch stations in low gravity, laboratories, jungles of solar panels, communication, deep space telescopes, military purposes,etc plus a small resort for 100 millions a person to finance everything with surplus. On a second though, forget about all of that, how about three tiny cameras stationed nearby the Apollo landing zone with live feed to a web page!!!
We deserve better than this !!! and paying Russia to Launch our Personnel and supplies isn't the Answer !!! This is probably better than ourICBMs would do if we actually needed them !!!! STOP THE BS Its time to show theWORLD some of the ADVANCED TECNOLOGY WE ALREADY HAVE AND ARE HIDING FROM THE PUBLIC !!!!!!
Rocketry is dangerous and failures are common… this is not surprising, and it certainly does not disprove the 1969 moon landing.
This comment section is full of morons.
This is the consequence of de-industrialization of the United States
US aerospace industry is about to collapse
An expensive fire works show.
This is what happens when you take number 9 in counting.
SpaceX rocket explodes after launch
It was unmanned, and astronauts aboard the International Space Station still have 4 months of supplies. But it’s the third failed cargo mission to ISS in 8 months.
nobody died?
well… okay then. sh*t happens, right? build another one. yes, it's expensive, but if you're not down to lose a few rockets, you should probably get out of rocketry. like cdr. kelly (who is on the space station right now) said when he watched this, "space is hard."
I am just wondering what was released in our atmosphere with this "failure"?
With all the advances made in technology we still launch rockets that fail – NASA should probably update their methods or at least use the alien technology their hiding
In fifty years many things could have been achieved at least; self contained clusters of space stations on the moon and its vicinity, growing food in green houses, launch stations in low gravity, laboratories, jungles of solar panels, communication, deep space telescopes, military purposes,etc plus a small resort for 100 millions a person to finance everything with surplus. On a second though, forget about all of that, how about three tiny cameras stationed nearby the Apollo landing zone with live feed to a web page!!!
karma?
Yet in 1969 we landed a man on the moon (supposedly)
you can see pieces falling off and some discharge of smoke or fuel 0:44 to 0:46 and then boom
We deserve better than this !!! and paying Russia to Launch our Personnel and supplies isn't the Answer !!! This is probably better than ourICBMs would do if we actually needed them !!!! STOP THE BS Its time to show theWORLD some of the ADVANCED TECNOLOGY WE ALREADY HAVE AND ARE HIDING FROM THE PUBLIC !!!!!!
Planned event. Anybody else note the complete lack of emotion and surprise ,in his voice, at this explosion.
BS
Check out this video on YouTube:
I'm glad my government steals from me in taxes and wastes it on projects like this.
Wow! Sorry, SpaceX.
This is what happens when the Federal Government is Broke. They can't even launch a routine basic rocket into the air.