About The Author
-

20 Comments

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • James Lapid
    Reply

    Nate Diaz displayed an eloquence and command of the language scarcely excelled by the greatest orators in their own tongue.

  • Tokyo Inooshi
    Reply

    LMAO!!! I love to hear him talk about anything. I want to hear his view on more important situation going on in the world.

  • WeGottaSituation
    Reply

    Even though Nate lost 3 out of his most recent fights, I'd still rather watch him fight than Rafael Dos Anjos.

  • Socrates
    Reply

    Melendez landed 98 strikes, Alvarez landed 44. Eddie landed 3 shitty takedowns but couldn't keep Gilbert down. Gilbert completely disfigured his face. How the fuck did he lose? I'm fucking sick of this 10-9 must system, it allows people to fight like bitches and get away with it. They should do scores for everything you do in the fight, for example. If you land 10 clean strikes you should get 5 points, if you land a double leg against the cage and your opponent springs back up you should get 1 point. If you get a high point takedown like in wrestling, you should get 4 points, if you advance you position on the ground you should get 2 points, for a near submission you should get 4 points, for rocking or dropping someone, you should get 4 points, at the end of the round it should ask 2 questions "who was the aggressor" and " who landed the more effective strikes" each category should give you an extra 4 points. Then at the end of the fight whoever scored the most points should win. Scoring should be done manually on a computer with stats popping up. And it should go of the full fight total points, not round by round. Scoring like this would stop people fighting like bitches 2 the 10-9 must