Wow. These guys love what they do. At their age, there would be no shame at all in retiring but yet they still work – which, as you can see, gives them little free time. I would imagine that at that age free time would be golden. It is obvious that they are well-off and that they could sustain their lifestyles if they were to retire. Yet they do not! It is so nice to see that someone is extremely happy to be in their position.
Here in Australia, judges have to retire at age 70. Our supreme court is called the High Court, and until the 1980s youcould appeal from that to the former House of Lords in London. Abolishing that avenue of appeal was Australia's last step to fullindependence. I'm proud that my country inherited the English legal system
Please lord hear my words .please bring justice into my life ,if you can hear my deep inna crying , please please do the good thing let me have my day of justice, against the evil that walk the earth.
For fuck sake, fuck off with this diversity argument. Judges are appointed based on MERITS, not nationality, not ethnicity, not gender, not how many fucking houses they own. The reason there is only one woman on the panel of judges in the supreme court, is because women do not fucking put the kind of effort in that can see them in these positions! Why are CEOs and Managers of businesses mostly men? Because they get there by whatever means necessary, women either coast or settle in a role they can do, because they do not like being put in situations they have not been in before. Why do you think most secretaries and receptionists are women? Because they are content like that and know they would have to do more if they worked their way up. I knew a few women who actually worked up to higher roles in a retail company, and agree with me. Women just don't put the effort in, apart from a very very small minority. Women like Lady Hale are that minority.
Britain's "top judges" have never protected our illusory "democracy". I have a completely false 'supreme Court order" from oct 2013 which is entirely bogus, because it falsely states "no issue of Public interest or point of Law" which is the opposite of the truth: as it condones the wrongful dismissal of my DEFENCE as well as my Counterclaim against a fraudulent 'nullity' possession claim – which no court officer has ever detected isn't even validly issued! bearing no court seal…so fundamental, no proof of debt, and in 8 years there has never been a single Fact Find or determination of merit… but was deliberately sent off at a tangent to "appeal" before even the compelling Preliminary issues were dealt with.
There is no separation of powers either – that is provably untrue: they all work for the Crown Corporation who control the Bank of England and all banks, the IMF and Feds in the USA, all HMCTS for the private interest of Rothschild – who unconstitutionally took over the Monarchy and Bank of England in exchange for "expunging King George 3rds debts in the Bank of England" – the latter is now notably being investigated by the SFO for "fraud". But alas, the SFO, too, is controlled by the privately run Crown Corporation, so is tarred with the same brush – so how can they 'find' against themselves and why would they? This is capture investigation and a huge conflict of interests. The Supreme Court was never constitutionally set up, and it started with 1 party missing, so who voted them in?
i personally think the most distinguishing factor that makes the story of the United States romantic and more appealing is the fact that as compared to US, the UK was a monarchy before it became a republic. The ages of monarchical rule in any setting tends to make people think in a certain direction. this is completely absent in the American psyche
why do the courts sometimes wrongly grant social services care orders against parents children who have been wrongly labled abusive parents by them who haven't done anything wrong when they have no evidence and social services have corrupted paperwork? do the courts and the system make alot of profit from granting care orders? its not right as young people have had their lives screwed around in these scenarios for nothing yet serious crimes are being ignored. paperwork is far to easy to corrupt for profit
Wow. These guys love what they do. At their age, there would be no shame at all in retiring but yet they still work – which, as you can see, gives them little free time. I would imagine that at that age free time would be golden. It is obvious that they are well-off and that they could sustain their lifestyles if they were to retire. Yet they do not! It is so nice to see that someone is extremely happy to be in their position.
anyone know the name of the song at 30:57?
Here in Australia, judges have to retire at age 70. Our supreme court is called the High Court, and until the 1980s youcould appeal from that to the former House of Lords in London. Abolishing that avenue of appeal was Australia's last step to fullindependence. I'm proud that my country inherited the English legal system
Great documentary on the UK Supreme Court
Great examplers of what is impartiality and good judgement………..
Please lord hear my words .please bring justice into my life ,if you can hear my deep inna crying , please please do the good thing let me have my day of justice, against the evil that walk the earth.
The song used for the intro for the fist 5 seconds is called Vladimir's Blues – Max Richter
For fuck sake, fuck off with this diversity argument. Judges are appointed based on MERITS, not nationality, not ethnicity, not gender, not how many fucking houses they own. The reason there is only one woman on the panel of judges in the supreme court, is because women do not fucking put the kind of effort in that can see them in these positions! Why are CEOs and Managers of businesses mostly men? Because they get there by whatever means necessary, women either coast or settle in a role they can do, because they do not like being put in situations they have not been in before. Why do you think most secretaries and receptionists are women? Because they are content like that and know they would have to do more if they worked their way up. I knew a few women who actually worked up to higher roles in a retail company, and agree with me. Women just don't put the effort in, apart from a very very small minority. Women like Lady Hale are that minority.
They having a party due to the Tories winning the election.
Music in the first 5 mins is called time lapse by Michael nyman
I prefer John Oliver's dogs with fake paws approach.
Britain's "top judges" have never protected our illusory "democracy". I have a completely false 'supreme Court order" from oct 2013 which is entirely bogus, because it falsely states "no issue of Public interest or point of Law" which is the opposite of the truth: as it condones the wrongful dismissal of my DEFENCE as well as my Counterclaim against a fraudulent 'nullity' possession claim – which no court officer has ever detected isn't even validly issued! bearing no court seal…so fundamental, no proof of debt, and in 8 years there has never been a single Fact Find or determination of merit… but was deliberately sent off at a tangent to "appeal" before even the compelling Preliminary issues were dealt with.
There is no separation of powers either – that is provably untrue: they all work for the Crown Corporation who control the Bank of England and all banks, the IMF and Feds in the USA, all HMCTS for the private interest of Rothschild – who unconstitutionally took over the Monarchy and Bank of England in exchange for "expunging King George 3rds debts in the Bank of England" – the latter is now notably being investigated by the SFO for "fraud". But alas, the SFO, too, is controlled by the privately run Crown Corporation, so is tarred with the same brush – so how can they 'find' against themselves and why would they? This is capture investigation and a huge conflict of interests. The Supreme Court was never constitutionally set up, and it started with 1 party missing, so who voted them in?
business is booming…
For whatever it`s worth, TTIP will by-pass this as corrupt as it already is
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZtYENfNa7k
i personally think the most distinguishing factor that makes the story of the United States romantic and more appealing is the fact that as compared to US, the UK was a monarchy before it became a republic. The ages of monarchical rule in any setting tends to make people think in a certain direction. this is completely absent in the American psyche
Justice is in the interest of the stronger.
Plato
LAW IN THE DEMOCRATIC UK , HA HA HA HA HA HA HA , MASONIC SCUM
why do the courts sometimes wrongly grant social services care orders against parents children who have been wrongly labled abusive parents by them who haven't done anything wrong when they have no evidence and social services have corrupted paperwork? do the courts and the system make alot of profit from granting care orders? its not right as young people have had their lives screwed around in these scenarios for nothing yet serious crimes are being ignored. paperwork is far to easy to corrupt for profit
Lord Philips was truly inspirational